Re: [-empyre-] retinas
At 04:20 PM 2/05/2003 +1000, gen[us]i wrote:
Well, papers and artworks - I'm being very old-fashioned, but the fact is, I
can't properly get my head around the ephemerality of email; it makes me not
want to put the sort of effort into writing about complex ideas in a post;.
. .email just doesn't seem like a place where I want to do hard work,
especially when I have so many other things I have to write.
am curious...is there any other net.worked communication avenues u use in
textual sense that n.cludes a "hard work" orientation [eg PANS etc]? i'm
currently lap.topless + am geophysically scattered frequently so use my
mobile 2 jot down theory|creative not[ation]es?
Given that empyre is a list with certain presumptions that there will be a
low noise ratio (which I wouldn't have any other way; I have a very short
fuse with half-baked posts these days),
I cannot personally find the time to
put into researching minor articles to post to the list (unless I could
combine that research and writing with some other purpose, I guess)
(Perhaps some empyreans think that I should not be on empyre?; this textual
gift economy that i'm not complying to. . .)
hmm. well u've just revoked that ca[u]ll by providing this post, yes?
that said, Jim, your forthcoming topic may get a spark outta me,
particularly since I spend all my days programming multiple levels of
how so geni? [details?]
[u've probably answered this already.]
- what I think we need is a new linguistics, to go with a
phenomenological analysis; a linguistics that copes with the network and
multiple, interconnected textualities; that can provide us with some
structural tools without fading into a mixture of mathematics, physics and
mysticism . . .
curiouser + curious.her,
_men[iscus_heart] plucking via broken bag.ga[u]ges_
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and